Obama Administration, BP Need to Answer Tough Questions
May 3, 2010
Neither the Obama
administration nor British Petroleum should be allowed to dodge tough
questions about the Deepwater Horizon blowout and oil spill by claiming
that such an accident was unprecedented, Republicans for Environmental
Protection (REP) said today.
"An
offshore oil well blowout last August that spewed oil into the Timor
Sea unabated for more than two months not only provided ample warning
that such a blowout could occur, it exposed serious vulnerabilities in
the oil industry's ability to respond," David Jenkins, REP vice
president for government and political affairs, said.
"Have
the administration or BP implemented any new safeguards with respect to
offshore drilling operations or oil spill response as a result of the
Timor Sea blowout? If so, what were they? If not, why not? These
questions deserve answers," Jenkins said.
"It
took five attempts to finally plug the Timor Sea leak, where the
wellhead was in only about 260 feet of water. That difficult and time
consuming operation should have set off loud alarm bells with respect
to deepwater wells in the Gulf that sit 5,000 feet below the surface,"
Jim DiPeso, REP vice president for policy and communications, said.
At
a November 19, 2009 hearing before the Senate Energy and Natural
Resources Committee, Minerals Management Service Deputy Director Walter
Cruickshank expressed confidence in U.S. oil industry spill response
protocols and capabilities when asked about the Timor Sea incident.
"One
must really question the quality of federal oversight when we are faced
with an oil spill that is so clearly overwhelming the ability to
respond," DiPeso said. "The people and ecology of the Gulf Coast should
never be presented with such a calamitous fait accompli."
"Hurricane
Katrina was an act of God that we could only respond to. This oil spill
is a man-made catastrophe that should have been prevented—and
accountability ultimately lies with BP and the current administration,"
Jenkins said.